Skip to content

The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head

ResecurityorThreatMon?

Where Resecurity and ThreatMon differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.

Updated October 12, 2026 How scoring works
Resecurity
Broad CTI platform
35.9
Rank #33 of 34

Resecurity, based in Los Angeles, sells threat intelligence, digital risk, attack surface, endpoint and identity products. Compromised-credential monitoring draws on its dark web repository; there is no standalone stealer-log product.

ThreatMon
Broad CTI platform
41.0
Rank #28 of 34
Ahead overall

ThreatMon, from Istanbul, covers attack surface, fraud, dark web, CTI and supply-chain risk. Its botnet monitoring tracks stealer logs and scans for stolen employee and customer credentials.

Quick take

ThreatMon leads by a clear margin, 41.0 to 35.9 overall. The biggest single difference is free access, where ThreatMon scores 5 against 1. Of the nine criteria, Resecurity is ahead on 1, ThreatMon on 3, and 5 are level.

Where they differ

Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.

Free Tools & Free API

ThreatMon +4
Resecurity 1
ThreatMon 5

Infostealer Research & Attribution

Resecurity +2
Resecurity 7
ThreatMon 5

Pricing Accessibility & Time-to-Value

ThreatMon +2
Resecurity 3
ThreatMon 5

Infostealer Specialization

ThreatMon +1
Resecurity 3
ThreatMon 4

Where they are level

Within half a point of each other.

Machine Context · 2/10 Segmentation · 5/10 Sessions · 1/10 Freshness · 6/10 API · 5/10

Capabilities

4 of 8 capabilities differ.

CapabilityResecurityThreatMon
Third-party / supply-chain exposure Partial Yes
Free tier / free API No Partial
Self-serve signup No Partial
Public infostealer research Yes Partial

Same on both: Machine-level infection data (no), Session cookies & tokens (no), Employee vs. customer split (partial), API access (partial).

Side by side

DetailResecurityThreatMon
Best suited to Organisations that want one vendor for several security products Teams wanting an all-in-one CTI and ASM tool
Pricing Pricing on request Pricing not published; free trial
Headquarters Los Angeles, USA Istanbul, Turkey
Founded 2016 2022
Ownership Independent Independent
Website resecurity.com threatmon.io

Questions & answers

Which scores higher, Resecurity or ThreatMon?

ThreatMon, with 41.0/100 against 35.9/100 (ranks #28 and #33).

Where do Resecurity and ThreatMon differ most?

On free tools & free api: Resecurity scores 1 and ThreatMon scores 5.

Who is each one a good fit for?

Resecurity suits organisations that want one vendor for several security products. ThreatMon suits teams wanting an all-in-one CTI and ASM tool.

More head-to-heads

Each vendor against its closest peers.

See your own infostealer exposure

Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.

Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.

This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.

Free Tools Check your exposure