Skip to content

The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head

Hold SecurityorResecurity?

Where Hold Security and Resecurity differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.

Updated October 12, 2026 How scoring works
Hold Security
Infostealer specialist
36.4
Rank #32 of 34
Ahead overall

Hold Security, led by Alex Holden in Milwaukee, is known for recovering large troves of botnet-stolen credentials. It runs a managed service that alerts companies when their own, their customers' or their suppliers' credentials turn up in non-public criminal sources.

Resecurity
Broad CTI platform
35.9
Rank #33 of 34

Resecurity, based in Los Angeles, sells threat intelligence, digital risk, attack surface, endpoint and identity products. Compromised-credential monitoring draws on its dark web repository; there is no standalone stealer-log product.

Quick take

Hold Security leads by a narrow margin, 36.4 to 35.9 overall. The biggest single difference is specialization, where Hold Security scores 6 against 3. Of the nine criteria, Hold Security is ahead on 2, Resecurity on 2, and 5 are level.

Where they differ

Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.

Infostealer Specialization

Hold Security +3
Hold Security 6
Resecurity 3

API & Integrations

Resecurity +3
Hold Security 2
Resecurity 5

Infostealer Research & Attribution

Resecurity +2
Hold Security 5
Resecurity 7

Session Cookie & Token Coverage

Hold Security +1
Hold Security 2
Resecurity 1

Where they are level

Within half a point of each other.

Machine Context · 2/10 Segmentation · 5/10 Freshness · 6/10 Free Access · 1/10 Accessibility · 3/10

Capabilities

2 of 8 capabilities differ.

CapabilityHold SecurityResecurity
API access No Partial
Public infostealer research Partial Yes

Same on both: Machine-level infection data (no), Session cookies & tokens (no), Employee vs. customer split (partial), Third-party / supply-chain exposure (partial), Free tier / free API (no), Self-serve signup (no).

Side by side

DetailHold SecurityResecurity
Best suited to Organisations that prefer a managed credential-recovery service Organisations that want one vendor for several security products
Pricing Pricing not published Pricing on request
Headquarters Milwaukee, USA Los Angeles, USA
Founded Not disclosed 2016
Ownership Independent Independent
Website holdsecurity.com resecurity.com

Questions & answers

Which scores higher, Hold Security or Resecurity?

Hold Security, with 36.4/100 against 35.9/100 (ranks #32 and #33).

Where do Hold Security and Resecurity differ most?

On infostealer specialization: Hold Security scores 6 and Resecurity scores 3.

Who is each one a good fit for?

Hold Security suits organisations that prefer a managed credential-recovery service. Resecurity suits organisations that want one vendor for several security products.

More head-to-heads

Each vendor against its closest peers.

See your own infostealer exposure

Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.

Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.

This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.

Free Tools Check your exposure