The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
HHold Securityor
RResecurity?
Where Hold Security and Resecurity differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
Hold Security, led by Alex Holden in Milwaukee, is known for recovering large troves of botnet-stolen credentials. It runs a managed service that alerts companies when their own, their customers' or their suppliers' credentials turn up in non-public criminal sources.
Resecurity, based in Los Angeles, sells threat intelligence, digital risk, attack surface, endpoint and identity products. Compromised-credential monitoring draws on its dark web repository; there is no standalone stealer-log product.
Quick take
Hold Security leads by a narrow margin, 36.4 to 35.9 overall. The biggest single difference is specialization, where Hold Security scores 6 against 3. Of the nine criteria, Hold Security is ahead on 2, Resecurity on 2, and 5 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
Infostealer Specialization
API & Integrations
Infostealer Research & Attribution
Session Cookie & Token Coverage
Where they are level
Within half a point of each other.
Capabilities
2 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| API access | No | Partial |
| Public infostealer research | Partial | Yes |
Same on both: Machine-level infection data (no), Session cookies & tokens (no), Employee vs. customer split (partial), Third-party / supply-chain exposure (partial), Free tier / free API (no), Self-serve signup (no).
Side by side
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Organisations that prefer a managed credential-recovery service | Organisations that want one vendor for several security products |
| Pricing | Pricing not published | Pricing on request |
| Headquarters | Milwaukee, USA | Los Angeles, USA |
| Founded | Not disclosed | 2016 |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Website | holdsecurity.com | resecurity.com |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Hold Security or Resecurity?
Hold Security, with 36.4/100 against 35.9/100 (ranks #32 and #33).
Where do Hold Security and Resecurity differ most?
On infostealer specialization: Hold Security scores 6 and Resecurity scores 3.
Who is each one a good fit for?
Hold Security suits organisations that prefer a managed credential-recovery service. Resecurity suits organisations that want one vendor for several security products.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.