The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
RResecurityor
SSearchlight Cyber?
Where Resecurity and Searchlight Cyber differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
R Resecurity, based in Los Angeles, sells threat intelligence, digital risk, attack surface, endpoint and identity products. Compromised-credential monitoring draws on its dark web repository; there is no standalone stealer-log product.
S Searchlight Cyber, from Portsmouth, sells DarkIQ for dark web monitoring and Cerberus for investigations, and acquired Assetnote in 2025. DarkIQ alerts on credentials found in stealer logs across dark web and Telegram sources.
RS
Quick take
Searchlight Cyber leads by a clear margin, 44.9 to 35.9 overall. The biggest single difference is machine context, where Searchlight Cyber scores 5 against 2. Of the nine criteria, Resecurity is ahead on 0, Searchlight Cyber on 5, and 4 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
Machine-Level Infection Context
SSearchlight Cyber +3
RResecurity 2
SSearchlight Cyber 5
Infostealer Specialization
SSearchlight Cyber +1
RResecurity 3
SSearchlight Cyber 4
Session Cookie & Token Coverage
SSearchlight Cyber +1
RResecurity 1
SSearchlight Cyber 2
Collection Freshness
SSearchlight Cyber +1
RResecurity 6
SSearchlight Cyber 7
Infostealer Research & Attribution
SSearchlight Cyber +1
RResecurity 7
SSearchlight Cyber 8
Where they are level
Within half a point of each other.
Capabilities
2 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | RResecurity | SSearchlight Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| Machine-level infection data | No | Partial |
| Third-party / supply-chain exposure | Partial | No |
Same on both: Session cookies & tokens (no), Employee vs. customer split (partial), API access (partial), Free tier / free API (no), Self-serve signup (no), Public infostealer research (yes).
Side by side
| Detail | RResecurity | SSearchlight Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Organisations that want one vendor for several security products | Investigation teams that need dark web monitoring |
| Pricing | Pricing on request | Pricing on request |
| Headquarters | Los Angeles, USA | Portsmouth, UK |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Website | resecurity.com | slcyber.io |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Resecurity or Searchlight Cyber?
Searchlight Cyber, with 44.9/100 against 35.9/100 (ranks #24 and #33).
Where do Resecurity and Searchlight Cyber differ most?
On machine-level infection context: Resecurity scores 2 and Searchlight Cyber scores 5.
Who is each one a good fit for?
Resecurity suits organisations that want one vendor for several security products. Searchlight Cyber suits investigation teams that need dark web monitoring.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.