The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
IIntelligence Xor
TThreatMon?
Where Intelligence X and ThreatMon differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
I Intelligence X, from Prague, indexes emails, domains, IPs and wallet addresses across pastes, leaks, the darknet and the public web. Stealer-log search is on paid plans, with exports and the leaks API on higher licences.
T ThreatMon, from Istanbul, covers attack surface, fraud, dark web, CTI and supply-chain risk. Its botnet monitoring tracks stealer logs and scans for stolen employee and customer credentials.
IT
Quick take
Intelligence X leads by a narrow margin, 41.2 to 41.0 overall. The biggest single difference is segmentation, where ThreatMon scores 5 against 2. Of the nine criteria, Intelligence X is ahead on 2, ThreatMon on 1, and 6 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
Exposure Segmentation
TThreatMon +3
IIntelligence X 2
TThreatMon 5
API & Integrations
IIntelligence X +3
IIntelligence X 8
TThreatMon 5
Pricing Accessibility & Time-to-Value
IIntelligence X +1
IIntelligence X 6
TThreatMon 5
Where they are level
Within half a point of each other.
Capabilities
3 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | IIntelligence X | TThreatMon |
|---|---|---|
| Employee vs. customer split | No | Partial |
| Third-party / supply-chain exposure | Partial | Yes |
| API access | Yes | Partial |
Same on both: Machine-level infection data (no), Session cookies & tokens (no), Free tier / free API (partial), Self-serve signup (partial), Public infostealer research (partial).
Side by side
| Detail | IIntelligence X | TThreatMon |
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Researchers running selector-based leak searches | Teams wanting an all-in-one CTI and ASM tool |
| Pricing | From €2,500 a year; stealer-log export from €10,000 a year | Pricing not published; free trial |
| Headquarters | Prague, Czech Republic | Istanbul, Turkey |
| Founded | 2018 | 2022 |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Website | intelx.io | threatmon.io |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Intelligence X or ThreatMon?
Intelligence X, with 41.2/100 against 41.0/100 (ranks #27 and #28).
Where do Intelligence X and ThreatMon differ most?
On exposure segmentation: Intelligence X scores 2 and ThreatMon scores 5.
Who is each one a good fit for?
Intelligence X suits researchers running selector-based leak searches. ThreatMon suits teams wanting an all-in-one CTI and ASM tool.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.