The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
LLunar (Webz.io)or
SSOCRadar?
Where Lunar (Webz.io) and SOCRadar differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
L Lunar is Webz.io's compromised-credential monitoring product. Verified domain owners can use the core platform free, with paid enterprise features for automation. It pulls in stealer logs, breach dumps, combolists and stolen cookies, with malware family and hardware ID context.
S SOCRadar combines attack surface management, digital risk protection and threat intelligence, and offers a free edition for small companies. Its identity module turns stealer data into per-endpoint views mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, including exposed apps and cookies.
LS
Quick take
Lunar (Webz.io) leads by a narrow margin, 70.4 to 70.4 overall. The biggest single difference is specialization, where Lunar (Webz.io) scores 8 against 5. Of the nine criteria, Lunar (Webz.io) is ahead on 4, SOCRadar on 4, and 1 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
Infostealer Specialization
LLunar (Webz.io) +3
LLunar (Webz.io) 8
SSOCRadar 5
Machine-Level Infection Context
SSOCRadar +3
LLunar (Webz.io) 6
SSOCRadar 9
Infostealer Research & Attribution
SSOCRadar +3
LLunar (Webz.io) 6
SSOCRadar 9
Exposure Segmentation
LLunar (Webz.io) +2
LLunar (Webz.io) 6
SSOCRadar 4
Pricing Accessibility & Time-to-Value
LLunar (Webz.io) +2
LLunar (Webz.io) 9
SSOCRadar 7
Collection Freshness
SSOCRadar +1
LLunar (Webz.io) 7
SSOCRadar 8
Free Tools & Free API
LLunar (Webz.io) +1
LLunar (Webz.io) 9
SSOCRadar 8
API & Integrations
SSOCRadar +1
LLunar (Webz.io) 5
SSOCRadar 6
Where they are level
Within half a point of each other.
Capabilities
3 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | LLunar (Webz.io) | SSOCRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Machine-level infection data | Partial | Yes |
| Employee vs. customer split | Partial | No |
| Self-serve signup | Yes | Partial |
Same on both: Session cookies & tokens (yes), Third-party / supply-chain exposure (partial), API access (partial), Free tier / free API (yes), Public infostealer research (yes).
Side by side
| Detail | LLunar (Webz.io) | SSOCRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Organisations that want baseline credential monitoring at no cost | Teams that want stealer forensics inside a broad CTI suite |
| Pricing | Core monitoring is free; enterprise features are paid | Free edition; paid tiers on request |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Delaware, USA |
| Founded | Not disclosed | 2018 |
| Ownership | Part of Webz.io | Independent |
| Website | lunarcyber.com | socradar.io |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Lunar (Webz.io) or SOCRadar?
Lunar (Webz.io), with 70.4/100 against 70.4/100 (ranks #5 and #6).
Where do Lunar (Webz.io) and SOCRadar differ most?
On infostealer specialization: Lunar (Webz.io) scores 8 and SOCRadar scores 5.
Who is each one a good fit for?
Lunar (Webz.io) suits organisations that want baseline credential monitoring at no cost. SOCRadar suits teams that want stealer forensics inside a broad CTI suite.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.