The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
FFlareor
SSOCRadar?
Where Flare and SOCRadar differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
F Flare, from Montreal, is a threat exposure management platform that watches the clear and dark web, Telegram and criminal forums. It matches stealer logs to a customer's identities and alerts on leaked credentials and live sessions, and its data is also embedded in other vendors' products.
S SOCRadar combines attack surface management, digital risk protection and threat intelligence, and offers a free edition for small companies. Its identity module turns stealer data into per-endpoint views mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, including exposed apps and cookies.
FS
Quick take
Flare leads by a wide margin, 82.8 to 70.4 overall. The biggest single difference is segmentation, where Flare scores 8 against 4. Of the nine criteria, Flare is ahead on 6, SOCRadar on 1, and 2 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
Exposure Segmentation
FFlare +4
FFlare 8
SSOCRadar 4
API & Integrations
FFlare +3
FFlare 9
SSOCRadar 6
Infostealer Specialization
FFlare +2
FFlare 7
SSOCRadar 5
Free Tools & Free API
SSOCRadar +2
FFlare 6
SSOCRadar 8
Pricing Accessibility & Time-to-Value
FFlare +2
FFlare 9
SSOCRadar 7
Session Cookie & Token Coverage
FFlare +1
FFlare 9
SSOCRadar 8
Collection Freshness
FFlare +1
FFlare 9
SSOCRadar 8
Where they are level
Within half a point of each other.
Capabilities
5 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | FFlare | SSOCRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Employee vs. customer split | Yes | No |
| Third-party / supply-chain exposure | Yes | Partial |
| API access | Yes | Partial |
| Free tier / free API | Partial | Yes |
| Self-serve signup | Yes | Partial |
Same on both: Machine-level infection data (yes), Session cookies & tokens (yes), Public infostealer research (yes).
Side by side
| Detail | FFlare | SSOCRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Teams that want exposure monitoring running quickly | Teams that want stealer forensics inside a broad CTI suite |
| Pricing | Pricing on request, with a self-serve free trial | Free edition; paid tiers on request |
| Headquarters | Montreal, Canada | Delaware, USA |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Website | flare.io | socradar.io |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Flare or SOCRadar?
Flare, with 82.8/100 against 70.4/100 (ranks #2 and #6).
Where do Flare and SOCRadar differ most?
On exposure segmentation: Flare scores 8 and SOCRadar scores 4.
Who is each one a good fit for?
Flare suits teams that want exposure monitoring running quickly. SOCRadar suits teams that want stealer forensics inside a broad CTI suite.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.