The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
FFlareor
LLunar (Webz.io)?
Where Flare and Lunar (Webz.io) differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
F Flare, from Montreal, is a threat exposure management platform that watches the clear and dark web, Telegram and criminal forums. It matches stealer logs to a customer's identities and alerts on leaked credentials and live sessions, and its data is also embedded in other vendors' products.
L Lunar is Webz.io's compromised-credential monitoring product. Verified domain owners can use the core platform free, with paid enterprise features for automation. It pulls in stealer logs, breach dumps, combolists and stolen cookies, with malware family and hardware ID context.
FL
Quick take
Flare leads by a wide margin, 82.8 to 70.4 overall. The biggest single difference is api, where Flare scores 9 against 5. Of the nine criteria, Flare is ahead on 6, Lunar (Webz.io) on 2, and 1 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
API & Integrations
FFlare +4
FFlare 9
LLunar (Webz.io) 5
Machine-Level Infection Context
FFlare +3
FFlare 9
LLunar (Webz.io) 6
Infostealer Research & Attribution
FFlare +3
FFlare 9
LLunar (Webz.io) 6
Free Tools & Free API
LLunar (Webz.io) +3
FFlare 6
LLunar (Webz.io) 9
Exposure Segmentation
FFlare +2
FFlare 8
LLunar (Webz.io) 6
Collection Freshness
FFlare +2
FFlare 9
LLunar (Webz.io) 7
Infostealer Specialization
LLunar (Webz.io) +1
FFlare 7
LLunar (Webz.io) 8
Session Cookie & Token Coverage
FFlare +1
FFlare 9
LLunar (Webz.io) 8
Where they are level
Within half a point of each other.
Capabilities
5 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | FFlare | LLunar (Webz.io) |
|---|---|---|
| Machine-level infection data | Yes | Partial |
| Employee vs. customer split | Yes | Partial |
| Third-party / supply-chain exposure | Yes | Partial |
| API access | Yes | Partial |
| Free tier / free API | Partial | Yes |
Same on both: Session cookies & tokens (yes), Self-serve signup (yes), Public infostealer research (yes).
Side by side
| Detail | FFlare | LLunar (Webz.io) |
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Teams that want exposure monitoring running quickly | Organisations that want baseline credential monitoring at no cost |
| Pricing | Pricing on request, with a self-serve free trial | Core monitoring is free; enterprise features are paid |
| Headquarters | Montreal, Canada | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Founded | 2017 | Not disclosed |
| Ownership | Independent | Part of Webz.io |
| Website | flare.io | lunarcyber.com |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Flare or Lunar (Webz.io)?
Flare, with 82.8/100 against 70.4/100 (ranks #2 and #5).
Where do Flare and Lunar (Webz.io) differ most?
On api & integrations: Flare scores 9 and Lunar (Webz.io) scores 5.
Who is each one a good fit for?
Flare suits teams that want exposure monitoring running quickly. Lunar (Webz.io) suits organisations that want baseline credential monitoring at no cost.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.