The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
LLunar (Webz.io)or
WWhiteIntel?
Where Lunar (Webz.io) and WhiteIntel differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
L Lunar is Webz.io's compromised-credential monitoring product. Verified domain owners can use the core platform free, with paid enterprise features for automation. It pulls in stealer logs, breach dumps, combolists and stolen cookies, with malware family and hardware ID context.
W WhiteIntel monitors the dark web, hacker forums, Telegram and stealer logs, and adds look-alike domain detection and GitHub secret scanning. Its domain search separates consumer leaks from corporate ones.
LW
Quick take
Lunar (Webz.io) leads by a clear margin, 70.4 to 61.1 overall. The biggest single difference is free access, where Lunar (Webz.io) scores 9 against 4. Of the nine criteria, Lunar (Webz.io) is ahead on 6, WhiteIntel on 1, and 2 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
Free Tools & Free API
LLunar (Webz.io) +5
LLunar (Webz.io) 9
WWhiteIntel 4
API & Integrations
WWhiteIntel +3
LLunar (Webz.io) 5
WWhiteIntel 8
Session Cookie & Token Coverage
LLunar (Webz.io) +2
LLunar (Webz.io) 8
WWhiteIntel 6
Pricing Accessibility & Time-to-Value
LLunar (Webz.io) +2
LLunar (Webz.io) 9
WWhiteIntel 7
Machine-Level Infection Context
LLunar (Webz.io) +1
LLunar (Webz.io) 6
WWhiteIntel 5
Exposure Segmentation
LLunar (Webz.io) +1
LLunar (Webz.io) 6
WWhiteIntel 5
Infostealer Research & Attribution
LLunar (Webz.io) +1
LLunar (Webz.io) 6
WWhiteIntel 5
Where they are level
Within half a point of each other.
Capabilities
6 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | LLunar (Webz.io) | WWhiteIntel |
|---|---|---|
| Session cookies & tokens | Yes | Partial |
| Third-party / supply-chain exposure | Partial | No |
| API access | Partial | Yes |
| Free tier / free API | Yes | Partial |
| Self-serve signup | Yes | Partial |
| Public infostealer research | Yes | Partial |
Same on both: Machine-level infection data (partial), Employee vs. customer split (partial).
Side by side
| Detail | LLunar (Webz.io) | WWhiteIntel |
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Organisations that want baseline credential monitoring at no cost | Smaller teams looking for affordable stealer monitoring |
| Pricing | Core monitoring is free; enterprise features are paid | Pricing not published |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not disclosed |
| Founded | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Ownership | Part of Webz.io | Independent |
| Website | lunarcyber.com | whiteintel.io |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Lunar (Webz.io) or WhiteIntel?
Lunar (Webz.io), with 70.4/100 against 61.1/100 (ranks #5 and #12).
Where do Lunar (Webz.io) and WhiteIntel differ most?
On free tools & free api: Lunar (Webz.io) scores 9 and WhiteIntel scores 4.
Who is each one a good fit for?
Lunar (Webz.io) suits organisations that want baseline credential monitoring at no cost. WhiteIntel suits smaller teams looking for affordable stealer monitoring.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.