The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
HHudson Rockor
CCheck Point (Cyberint)?
Where Hudson Rock and Check Point (Cyberint) differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
Hudson Rock was started by former members of IDF Unit 8200 and works on one problem only: infostealer infections. Its Cavalier platform shows what each infected computer leaked, from credentials and cookies to the malware path and antivirus in place, and splits a company's exposure into employees, users, third parties and suppliers. It is also the research team behind InfoStealers.
Cyberint, maker of the Argos external risk platform, was acquired by Check Point in 2024 and is now part of Check Point Exposure Management. Its dark web monitoring sends verified alerts on leaked employee credentials and infections, combining automation with human intelligence.
Quick take
Hudson Rock leads by a wide margin, 96.2 to 53.1 overall. The biggest single difference is specialization, where Hudson Rock scores 10 against 4. Of the nine criteria, Hudson Rock is ahead on 9, Check Point (Cyberint) on 0, and 0 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
Infostealer Specialization
Session Cookie & Token Coverage
Free Tools & Free API
Pricing Accessibility & Time-to-Value
Machine-Level Infection Context
Exposure Segmentation
Collection Freshness
Infostealer Research & Attribution
API & Integrations
Capabilities
6 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Machine-level infection data | Yes | Partial |
| Session cookies & tokens | Yes | No |
| Employee vs. customer split | Yes | Partial |
| Third-party / supply-chain exposure | Yes | Partial |
| Free tier / free API | Yes | Partial |
| Self-serve signup | Partial | No |
Same on both: API access (yes), Public infostealer research (yes).
Side by side
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Security teams that need per-machine forensics and visibility into supplier exposure | Check Point customers who want dark web alerts linked to remediation |
| Pricing | Free lookups and a free API key; Bayonet has a free signup with paid tiers; Cavalier is priced on request | Pricing on request |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Founded | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Ownership | Independent | Acquired by Check Point (2024) |
| Website | hudsonrock.com | checkpoint.com |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Hudson Rock or Check Point (Cyberint)?
Hudson Rock, with 96.2/100 against 53.1/100 (ranks #1 and #13).
Where do Hudson Rock and Check Point (Cyberint) differ most?
On infostealer specialization: Hudson Rock scores 10 and Check Point (Cyberint) scores 4.
Who is each one a good fit for?
Hudson Rock suits security teams that need per-machine forensics and visibility into supplier exposure. Check Point (Cyberint) suits check Point customers who want dark web alerts linked to remediation.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.