Skip to content

The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head

Check Point (Cyberint)orCyble?

Where Check Point (Cyberint) and Cyble differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.

Updated October 12, 2026 How scoring works
Check Point (Cyberint)
Broad CTI platform
53.1
Rank #13 of 34
Ahead overall

Cyberint, maker of the Argos external risk platform, was acquired by Check Point in 2024 and is now part of Check Point Exposure Management. Its dark web monitoring sends verified alerts on leaked employee credentials and infections, combining automation with human intelligence.

Cyble
Broad CTI platform
47.5
Rank #21 of 34

Cyble's Vision platform bundles attack surface management, brand protection, vulnerability intelligence and dark web monitoring. Stealer-log alerts cover Tor, I2P, paste sites, forums and Telegram, backed by human analysts.

Quick take

Check Point (Cyberint) leads by a clear margin, 53.1 to 47.5 overall. The biggest single difference is segmentation, where Check Point (Cyberint) scores 6 against 3. Of the nine criteria, Check Point (Cyberint) is ahead on 2, Cyble on 0, and 7 are level.

Where they differ

Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.

Exposure Segmentation

Check Point (Cyberint) +3
Check Point (Cyberint) 6
Cyble 3

API & Integrations

Check Point (Cyberint) +2
Check Point (Cyberint) 8
Cyble 6

Where they are level

Within half a point of each other.

Specialization · 4/10 Machine Context · 5/10 Sessions · 3/10 Freshness · 7/10 Research · 8/10 Free Access · 4/10 Accessibility · 3/10

Capabilities

3 of 8 capabilities differ.

CapabilityCheck Point (Cyberint)Cyble
Employee vs. customer split Partial No
Third-party / supply-chain exposure Partial No
API access Yes Partial

Same on both: Machine-level infection data (partial), Session cookies & tokens (no), Free tier / free API (partial), Self-serve signup (no), Public infostealer research (yes).

Side by side

DetailCheck Point (Cyberint)Cyble
Best suited to Check Point customers who want dark web alerts linked to remediation Organisations that want dark web monitoring bundled with DRP and ASM
Pricing Pricing on request Pricing on request
Headquarters Tel Aviv, Israel Alpharetta, USA
Founded Not disclosed 2019
Ownership Acquired by Check Point (2024) Independent
Website checkpoint.com cyble.com

Questions & answers

Which scores higher, Check Point (Cyberint) or Cyble?

Check Point (Cyberint), with 53.1/100 against 47.5/100 (ranks #13 and #21).

Where do Check Point (Cyberint) and Cyble differ most?

On exposure segmentation: Check Point (Cyberint) scores 6 and Cyble scores 3.

Who is each one a good fit for?

Check Point (Cyberint) suits check Point customers who want dark web alerts linked to remediation. Cyble suits organisations that want dark web monitoring bundled with DRP and ASM.

More head-to-heads

Each vendor against its closest peers.

See your own infostealer exposure

Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.

Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.

This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.

Free Tools Check your exposure