The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
CCheck Point (Cyberint)or
OOutpost24 Threat Compass?
Where Check Point (Cyberint) and Outpost24 Threat Compass differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
C Cyberint, maker of the Argos external risk platform, was acquired by Check Point in 2024 and is now part of Check Point Exposure Management. Its dark web monitoring sends verified alerts on leaked employee credentials and infections, combining automation with human intelligence.
O Outpost24 is a Swedish exposure management vendor that bought Blueliv in 2021. Threat Compass retrieves stolen credentials, including from malware botnets, and a free checker reports stolen credentials and common malware for a domain.
CO
Quick take
Check Point (Cyberint) leads by a clear margin, 53.1 to 48.9 overall. The biggest single difference is api, where Check Point (Cyberint) scores 8 against 5. Of the nine criteria, Check Point (Cyberint) is ahead on 3, Outpost24 Threat Compass on 1, and 5 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
API & Integrations
CCheck Point (Cyberint) +3
CCheck Point (Cyberint) 8
OOutpost24 Threat Compass 5
Exposure Segmentation
CCheck Point (Cyberint) +1
CCheck Point (Cyberint) 6
OOutpost24 Threat Compass 5
Session Cookie & Token Coverage
CCheck Point (Cyberint) +1
CCheck Point (Cyberint) 3
OOutpost24 Threat Compass 2
Free Tools & Free API
OOutpost24 Threat Compass +1
CCheck Point (Cyberint) 4
OOutpost24 Threat Compass 5
Where they are level
Within half a point of each other.
Capabilities
2 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | CCheck Point (Cyberint) | OOutpost24 Threat Compass |
|---|---|---|
| Third-party / supply-chain exposure | Partial | No |
| API access | Yes | Partial |
Same on both: Machine-level infection data (partial), Session cookies & tokens (no), Employee vs. customer split (partial), Free tier / free API (partial), Self-serve signup (no), Public infostealer research (yes).
Side by side
| Detail | CCheck Point (Cyberint) | OOutpost24 Threat Compass |
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Check Point customers who want dark web alerts linked to remediation | Outpost24 customers adding credential intelligence |
| Pricing | Pricing on request | Modular pricing on request; free domain checker |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Sweden |
| Founded | Not disclosed | 2001 |
| Ownership | Acquired by Check Point (2024) | Independent (acquired Blueliv, 2021) |
| Website | checkpoint.com | outpost24.com |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Check Point (Cyberint) or Outpost24 Threat Compass?
Check Point (Cyberint), with 53.1/100 against 48.9/100 (ranks #13 and #17).
Where do Check Point (Cyberint) and Outpost24 Threat Compass differ most?
On api & integrations: Check Point (Cyberint) scores 8 and Outpost24 Threat Compass scores 5.
Who is each one a good fit for?
Check Point (Cyberint) suits check Point customers who want dark web alerts linked to remediation. Outpost24 Threat Compass suits outpost24 customers adding credential intelligence.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.