The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
HHudson Rockor
SSOCRadar?
Where Hudson Rock and SOCRadar differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
H Hudson Rock was started by former members of IDF Unit 8200 and works on one problem only: infostealer infections. Its Cavalier platform shows what each infected computer leaked, from credentials and cookies to the malware path and antivirus in place, and splits a company's exposure into employees, users, third parties and suppliers. It is also the research team behind InfoStealers.
S SOCRadar combines attack surface management, digital risk protection and threat intelligence, and offers a free edition for small companies. Its identity module turns stealer data into per-endpoint views mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, including exposed apps and cookies.
HS
Quick take
Hudson Rock leads by a wide margin, 96.2 to 70.4 overall. The biggest single difference is segmentation, where Hudson Rock scores 10 against 4. Of the nine criteria, Hudson Rock is ahead on 9, SOCRadar on 0, and 0 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
Exposure Segmentation
HHudson Rock +6
HHudson Rock 10
SSOCRadar 4
Infostealer Specialization
HHudson Rock +5
HHudson Rock 10
SSOCRadar 5
API & Integrations
HHudson Rock +3
HHudson Rock 9
SSOCRadar 6
Free Tools & Free API
HHudson Rock +2
HHudson Rock 10
SSOCRadar 8
Pricing Accessibility & Time-to-Value
HHudson Rock +2
HHudson Rock 9
SSOCRadar 7
Machine-Level Infection Context
HHudson Rock +1
HHudson Rock 10
SSOCRadar 9
Session Cookie & Token Coverage
HHudson Rock +1
HHudson Rock 9
SSOCRadar 8
Collection Freshness
HHudson Rock +1
HHudson Rock 9
SSOCRadar 8
Infostealer Research & Attribution
HHudson Rock +1
HHudson Rock 10
SSOCRadar 9
Capabilities
3 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | HHudson Rock | SSOCRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Employee vs. customer split | Yes | No |
| Third-party / supply-chain exposure | Yes | Partial |
| API access | Yes | Partial |
Same on both: Machine-level infection data (yes), Session cookies & tokens (yes), Free tier / free API (yes), Self-serve signup (partial), Public infostealer research (yes).
Side by side
| Detail | HHudson Rock | SSOCRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Security teams that need per-machine forensics and visibility into supplier exposure | Teams that want stealer forensics inside a broad CTI suite |
| Pricing | Free lookups and a free API key; Bayonet has a free signup with paid tiers; Cavalier is priced on request | Free edition; paid tiers on request |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Delaware, USA |
| Founded | Not disclosed | 2018 |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Website | hudsonrock.com | socradar.io |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Hudson Rock or SOCRadar?
Hudson Rock, with 96.2/100 against 70.4/100 (ranks #1 and #6).
Where do Hudson Rock and SOCRadar differ most?
On exposure segmentation: Hudson Rock scores 10 and SOCRadar scores 4.
Who is each one a good fit for?
Hudson Rock suits security teams that need per-machine forensics and visibility into supplier exposure. SOCRadar suits teams that want stealer forensics inside a broad CTI suite.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.