The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
HHold Securityor
TThreatMon?
Where Hold Security and ThreatMon differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
H Hold Security, led by Alex Holden in Milwaukee, is known for recovering large troves of botnet-stolen credentials. It runs a managed service that alerts companies when their own, their customers' or their suppliers' credentials turn up in non-public criminal sources.
T ThreatMon, from Istanbul, covers attack surface, fraud, dark web, CTI and supply-chain risk. Its botnet monitoring tracks stealer logs and scans for stolen employee and customer credentials.
HT
Quick take
ThreatMon leads by a clear margin, 41.0 to 36.4 overall. The biggest single difference is free access, where ThreatMon scores 5 against 1. Of the nine criteria, Hold Security is ahead on 2, ThreatMon on 3, and 4 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
Free Tools & Free API
TThreatMon +4
HHold Security 1
TThreatMon 5
API & Integrations
TThreatMon +3
HHold Security 2
TThreatMon 5
Infostealer Specialization
HHold Security +2
HHold Security 6
TThreatMon 4
Pricing Accessibility & Time-to-Value
TThreatMon +2
HHold Security 3
TThreatMon 5
Session Cookie & Token Coverage
HHold Security +1
HHold Security 2
TThreatMon 1
Where they are level
Within half a point of each other.
Capabilities
4 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | HHold Security | TThreatMon |
|---|---|---|
| Third-party / supply-chain exposure | Partial | Yes |
| API access | No | Partial |
| Free tier / free API | No | Partial |
| Self-serve signup | No | Partial |
Same on both: Machine-level infection data (no), Session cookies & tokens (no), Employee vs. customer split (partial), Public infostealer research (partial).
Side by side
| Detail | HHold Security | TThreatMon |
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Organisations that prefer a managed credential-recovery service | Teams wanting an all-in-one CTI and ASM tool |
| Pricing | Pricing not published | Pricing not published; free trial |
| Headquarters | Milwaukee, USA | Istanbul, Turkey |
| Founded | Not disclosed | 2022 |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Website | holdsecurity.com | threatmon.io |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Hold Security or ThreatMon?
ThreatMon, with 41.0/100 against 36.4/100 (ranks #28 and #32).
Where do Hold Security and ThreatMon differ most?
On free tools & free api: Hold Security scores 1 and ThreatMon scores 5.
Who is each one a good fit for?
Hold Security suits organisations that prefer a managed credential-recovery service. ThreatMon suits teams wanting an all-in-one CTI and ASM tool.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.