The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
FFlareor
SSpyCloud?
Where Flare and SpyCloud differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
F Flare, from Montreal, is a threat exposure management platform that watches the clear and dark web, Telegram and criminal forums. It matches stealer logs to a customer's identities and alerts on leaked credentials and live sessions, and its data is also embedded in other vendors' products.
S SpyCloud, based in Austin, recaptures data from breaches, infostealer malware, phishing kits and combolists and packages it into separate products for workforce, consumer, supply-chain and investigation use. Stolen session cookies and post-infection remediation are a central theme across the line-up.
FS
Quick take
Flare leads by a narrow margin, 82.8 to 81.3 overall. The biggest single difference is accessibility, where Flare scores 9 against 5. Of the nine criteria, Flare is ahead on 3, SpyCloud on 3, and 3 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
Pricing Accessibility & Time-to-Value
FFlare +4
FFlare 9
SSpyCloud 5
Infostealer Specialization
SSpyCloud +2
FFlare 7
SSpyCloud 9
Free Tools & Free API
FFlare +2
FFlare 6
SSpyCloud 4
Machine-Level Infection Context
FFlare +1
FFlare 9
SSpyCloud 8
Exposure Segmentation
SSpyCloud +1
FFlare 8
SSpyCloud 9
Session Cookie & Token Coverage
SSpyCloud +1
FFlare 9
SSpyCloud 10
Where they are level
Within half a point of each other.
Capabilities
1 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | FFlare | SSpyCloud |
|---|---|---|
| Self-serve signup | Yes | No |
Same on both: Machine-level infection data (yes), Session cookies & tokens (yes), Employee vs. customer split (yes), Third-party / supply-chain exposure (yes), API access (yes), Free tier / free API (partial), Public infostealer research (yes).
Side by side
| Detail | FFlare | SSpyCloud |
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Teams that want exposure monitoring running quickly | Large organisations focused on remediating identities exposed by malware |
| Pricing | Pricing on request, with a self-serve free trial | Enterprise pricing on request |
| Headquarters | Montreal, Canada | Austin, USA |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Website | flare.io | spycloud.com |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Flare or SpyCloud?
Flare, with 82.8/100 against 81.3/100 (ranks #2 and #3).
Where do Flare and SpyCloud differ most?
On pricing accessibility & time-to-value: Flare scores 9 and SpyCloud scores 5.
Who is each one a good fit for?
Flare suits teams that want exposure monitoring running quickly. SpyCloud suits large organisations focused on remediating identities exposed by malware.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.