The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
CCheck Point (Cyberint)or
SStealthMole?
Where Check Point (Cyberint) and StealthMole differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
C Cyberint, maker of the Argos external risk platform, was acquired by Check Point in 2024 and is now part of Check Point Exposure Management. Its dark web monitoring sends verified alerts on leaked employee credentials and infections, combining automation with human intelligence.
S StealthMole is a Singapore company with R&D in South Korea that serves law enforcement, government and enterprise teams. Its credential tools track logins stolen by families such as RedLine, Vidar and Raccoon and bundle URL-login-password data for investigation.
CS
Quick take
Check Point (Cyberint) leads by a clear margin, 53.1 to 47.8 overall. The biggest single difference is segmentation, where Check Point (Cyberint) scores 6 against 3. Of the nine criteria, Check Point (Cyberint) is ahead on 3, StealthMole on 2, and 4 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
Exposure Segmentation
CCheck Point (Cyberint) +3
CCheck Point (Cyberint) 6
SStealthMole 3
Infostealer Research & Attribution
CCheck Point (Cyberint) +3
CCheck Point (Cyberint) 8
SStealthMole 5
Infostealer Specialization
SStealthMole +1
CCheck Point (Cyberint) 4
SStealthMole 5
API & Integrations
CCheck Point (Cyberint) +1
CCheck Point (Cyberint) 8
SStealthMole 7
Pricing Accessibility & Time-to-Value
SStealthMole +1
CCheck Point (Cyberint) 3
SStealthMole 4
Where they are level
Within half a point of each other.
Capabilities
4 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | CCheck Point (Cyberint) | SStealthMole |
|---|---|---|
| Employee vs. customer split | Partial | No |
| Third-party / supply-chain exposure | Partial | No |
| Self-serve signup | No | Partial |
| Public infostealer research | Yes | Partial |
Same on both: Machine-level infection data (partial), Session cookies & tokens (no), API access (yes), Free tier / free API (partial).
Side by side
| Detail | CCheck Point (Cyberint) | SStealthMole |
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Check Point customers who want dark web alerts linked to remediation | Investigators and government agencies |
| Pricing | Pricing on request | Pricing on request |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Singapore |
| Founded | Not disclosed | 2022 |
| Ownership | Acquired by Check Point (2024) | Independent |
| Website | checkpoint.com | stealthmole.com |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Check Point (Cyberint) or StealthMole?
Check Point (Cyberint), with 53.1/100 against 47.8/100 (ranks #13 and #20).
Where do Check Point (Cyberint) and StealthMole differ most?
On exposure segmentation: Check Point (Cyberint) scores 6 and StealthMole scores 3.
Who is each one a good fit for?
Check Point (Cyberint) suits check Point customers who want dark web alerts linked to remediation. StealthMole suits investigators and government agencies.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.