The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
CCheck Point (Cyberint)or
CCloudSEK?
Where Check Point (Cyberint) and CloudSEK differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
C Cyberint, maker of the Argos external risk platform, was acquired by Check Point in 2024 and is now part of Check Point Exposure Management. Its dark web monitoring sends verified alerts on leaked employee credentials and infections, combining automation with human intelligence.
C CloudSEK, from Bengaluru, offers a family of external-threat products. XVigil watches the deep and dark web, Telegram and paste sites for leaked credentials, with stealer logs as one input among several.
CC
Quick take
Check Point (Cyberint) leads by a clear margin, 53.1 to 43.9 overall. The biggest single difference is api, where Check Point (Cyberint) scores 8 against 5. Of the nine criteria, Check Point (Cyberint) is ahead on 6, CloudSEK on 0, and 3 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
API & Integrations
CCheck Point (Cyberint) +3
CCheck Point (Cyberint) 8
CCloudSEK 5
Infostealer Specialization
CCheck Point (Cyberint) +1
CCheck Point (Cyberint) 4
CCloudSEK 3
Machine-Level Infection Context
CCheck Point (Cyberint) +1
CCheck Point (Cyberint) 5
CCloudSEK 4
Exposure Segmentation
CCheck Point (Cyberint) +1
CCheck Point (Cyberint) 6
CCloudSEK 5
Session Cookie & Token Coverage
CCheck Point (Cyberint) +1
CCheck Point (Cyberint) 3
CCloudSEK 2
Collection Freshness
CCheck Point (Cyberint) +1
CCheck Point (Cyberint) 7
CCloudSEK 6
Where they are level
Within half a point of each other.
Capabilities
2 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | CCheck Point (Cyberint) | CCloudSEK |
|---|---|---|
| Third-party / supply-chain exposure | Partial | Yes |
| API access | Yes | Partial |
Same on both: Machine-level infection data (partial), Session cookies & tokens (no), Employee vs. customer split (partial), Free tier / free API (partial), Self-serve signup (no), Public infostealer research (yes).
Side by side
| Detail | CCheck Point (Cyberint) | CCloudSEK |
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Check Point customers who want dark web alerts linked to remediation | Enterprises wanting broad digital risk protection |
| Pricing | Pricing on request | Pricing on request |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Bengaluru, India |
| Founded | Not disclosed | 2015 |
| Ownership | Acquired by Check Point (2024) | Independent |
| Website | checkpoint.com | cloudsek.com |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Check Point (Cyberint) or CloudSEK?
Check Point (Cyberint), with 53.1/100 against 43.9/100 (ranks #13 and #25).
Where do Check Point (Cyberint) and CloudSEK differ most?
On api & integrations: Check Point (Cyberint) scores 8 and CloudSEK scores 5.
Who is each one a good fit for?
Check Point (Cyberint) suits check Point customers who want dark web alerts linked to remediation. CloudSEK suits enterprises wanting broad digital risk protection.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.