Skip to content

The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head

Check Point (Cyberint)orSearchlight Cyber?

Where Check Point (Cyberint) and Searchlight Cyber differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.

Updated October 12, 2026 How scoring works
Check Point (Cyberint)
Broad CTI platform
53.1
Rank #13 of 34
Ahead overall

Cyberint, maker of the Argos external risk platform, was acquired by Check Point in 2024 and is now part of Check Point Exposure Management. Its dark web monitoring sends verified alerts on leaked employee credentials and infections, combining automation with human intelligence.

Searchlight Cyber
Broad CTI platform
44.9
Rank #24 of 34

Searchlight Cyber, from Portsmouth, sells DarkIQ for dark web monitoring and Cerberus for investigations, and acquired Assetnote in 2025. DarkIQ alerts on credentials found in stealer logs across dark web and Telegram sources.

Quick take

Check Point (Cyberint) leads by a clear margin, 53.1 to 44.9 overall. The biggest single difference is free access, where Check Point (Cyberint) scores 4 against 1. Of the nine criteria, Check Point (Cyberint) is ahead on 4, Searchlight Cyber on 0, and 5 are level.

Where they differ

Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.

Free Tools & Free API

Check Point (Cyberint) +3
Check Point (Cyberint) 4
Searchlight Cyber 1

API & Integrations

Check Point (Cyberint) +3
Check Point (Cyberint) 8
Searchlight Cyber 5

Exposure Segmentation

Check Point (Cyberint) +1
Check Point (Cyberint) 6
Searchlight Cyber 5

Session Cookie & Token Coverage

Check Point (Cyberint) +1
Check Point (Cyberint) 3
Searchlight Cyber 2

Where they are level

Within half a point of each other.

Specialization · 4/10 Machine Context · 5/10 Freshness · 7/10 Research · 8/10 Accessibility · 3/10

Capabilities

3 of 8 capabilities differ.

CapabilityCheck Point (Cyberint)Searchlight Cyber
Third-party / supply-chain exposure Partial No
API access Yes Partial
Free tier / free API Partial No

Same on both: Machine-level infection data (partial), Session cookies & tokens (no), Employee vs. customer split (partial), Self-serve signup (no), Public infostealer research (yes).

Side by side

DetailCheck Point (Cyberint)Searchlight Cyber
Best suited to Check Point customers who want dark web alerts linked to remediation Investigation teams that need dark web monitoring
Pricing Pricing on request Pricing on request
Headquarters Tel Aviv, Israel Portsmouth, UK
Founded Not disclosed 2017
Ownership Acquired by Check Point (2024) Independent
Website checkpoint.com slcyber.io

Questions & answers

Which scores higher, Check Point (Cyberint) or Searchlight Cyber?

Check Point (Cyberint), with 53.1/100 against 44.9/100 (ranks #13 and #24).

Where do Check Point (Cyberint) and Searchlight Cyber differ most?

On free tools & free api: Check Point (Cyberint) scores 4 and Searchlight Cyber scores 1.

Who is each one a good fit for?

Check Point (Cyberint) suits check Point customers who want dark web alerts linked to remediation. Searchlight Cyber suits investigation teams that need dark web monitoring.

More head-to-heads

Each vendor against its closest peers.

See your own infostealer exposure

Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.

Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.

This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.

Free Tools Check your exposure