The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
CCloudSEKor
CCyble?
Where CloudSEK and Cyble differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
C CloudSEK, from Bengaluru, offers a family of external-threat products. XVigil watches the deep and dark web, Telegram and paste sites for leaked credentials, with stealer logs as one input among several.
C Cyble's Vision platform bundles attack surface management, brand protection, vulnerability intelligence and dark web monitoring. Stealer-log alerts cover Tor, I2P, paste sites, forums and Telegram, backed by human analysts.
CC
Quick take
Cyble leads by a clear margin, 47.5 to 43.9 overall. The biggest single difference is segmentation, where CloudSEK scores 5 against 3. Of the nine criteria, CloudSEK is ahead on 1, Cyble on 5, and 3 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
Exposure Segmentation
CCloudSEK +2
CCloudSEK 5
CCyble 3
Infostealer Specialization
CCyble +1
CCloudSEK 3
CCyble 4
Machine-Level Infection Context
CCyble +1
CCloudSEK 4
CCyble 5
Session Cookie & Token Coverage
CCyble +1
CCloudSEK 2
CCyble 3
Collection Freshness
CCyble +1
CCloudSEK 6
CCyble 7
API & Integrations
CCyble +1
CCloudSEK 5
CCyble 6
Where they are level
Within half a point of each other.
Capabilities
2 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | CCloudSEK | CCyble |
|---|---|---|
| Employee vs. customer split | Partial | No |
| Third-party / supply-chain exposure | Yes | No |
Same on both: Machine-level infection data (partial), Session cookies & tokens (no), API access (partial), Free tier / free API (partial), Self-serve signup (no), Public infostealer research (yes).
Side by side
| Detail | CCloudSEK | CCyble |
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Enterprises wanting broad digital risk protection | Organisations that want dark web monitoring bundled with DRP and ASM |
| Pricing | Pricing on request | Pricing on request |
| Headquarters | Bengaluru, India | Alpharetta, USA |
| Founded | 2015 | 2019 |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Website | cloudsek.com | cyble.com |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, CloudSEK or Cyble?
Cyble, with 47.5/100 against 43.9/100 (ranks #21 and #25).
Where do CloudSEK and Cyble differ most?
On exposure segmentation: CloudSEK scores 5 and Cyble scores 3.
Who is each one a good fit for?
CloudSEK suits enterprises wanting broad digital risk protection. Cyble suits organisations that want dark web monitoring bundled with DRP and ASM.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.