The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
SStealthMoleor
TThreatMon?
Where StealthMole and ThreatMon differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
S StealthMole is a Singapore company with R&D in South Korea that serves law enforcement, government and enterprise teams. Its credential tools track logins stolen by families such as RedLine, Vidar and Raccoon and bundle URL-login-password data for investigation.
T ThreatMon, from Istanbul, covers attack surface, fraud, dark web, CTI and supply-chain risk. Its botnet monitoring tracks stealer logs and scans for stolen employee and customer credentials.
ST
Quick take
StealthMole leads by a clear margin, 47.8 to 41.0 overall. The biggest single difference is machine context, where StealthMole scores 5 against 2. Of the nine criteria, StealthMole is ahead on 5, ThreatMon on 3, and 1 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
Machine-Level Infection Context
SStealthMole +3
SStealthMole 5
TThreatMon 2
Exposure Segmentation
TThreatMon +2
SStealthMole 3
TThreatMon 5
Session Cookie & Token Coverage
SStealthMole +2
SStealthMole 3
TThreatMon 1
API & Integrations
SStealthMole +2
SStealthMole 7
TThreatMon 5
Infostealer Specialization
SStealthMole +1
SStealthMole 5
TThreatMon 4
Collection Freshness
SStealthMole +1
SStealthMole 7
TThreatMon 6
Free Tools & Free API
TThreatMon +1
SStealthMole 4
TThreatMon 5
Pricing Accessibility & Time-to-Value
TThreatMon +1
SStealthMole 4
TThreatMon 5
Where they are level
Within half a point of each other.
Capabilities
4 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | SStealthMole | TThreatMon |
|---|---|---|
| Machine-level infection data | Partial | No |
| Employee vs. customer split | No | Partial |
| Third-party / supply-chain exposure | No | Yes |
| API access | Yes | Partial |
Same on both: Session cookies & tokens (no), Free tier / free API (partial), Self-serve signup (partial), Public infostealer research (partial).
Side by side
| Detail | SStealthMole | TThreatMon |
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Investigators and government agencies | Teams wanting an all-in-one CTI and ASM tool |
| Pricing | Pricing on request | Pricing not published; free trial |
| Headquarters | Singapore | Istanbul, Turkey |
| Founded | 2022 | 2022 |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Website | stealthmole.com | threatmon.io |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, StealthMole or ThreatMon?
StealthMole, with 47.8/100 against 41.0/100 (ranks #20 and #28).
Where do StealthMole and ThreatMon differ most?
On machine-level infection context: StealthMole scores 5 and ThreatMon scores 2.
Who is each one a good fit for?
StealthMole suits investigators and government agencies. ThreatMon suits teams wanting an all-in-one CTI and ASM tool.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.