Skip to content

The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head

Outpost24 Threat CompassorThreatMon?

Where Outpost24 Threat Compass and ThreatMon differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.

Updated October 12, 2026 How scoring works
Outpost24 Threat Compass
Broad CTI platform
48.9
Rank #17 of 34
Ahead overall

Outpost24 is a Swedish exposure management vendor that bought Blueliv in 2021. Threat Compass retrieves stolen credentials, including from malware botnets, and a free checker reports stolen credentials and common malware for a domain.

ThreatMon
Broad CTI platform
41.0
Rank #28 of 34

ThreatMon, from Istanbul, covers attack surface, fraud, dark web, CTI and supply-chain risk. Its botnet monitoring tracks stealer logs and scans for stolen employee and customer credentials.

Quick take

Outpost24 Threat Compass leads by a clear margin, 48.9 to 41.0 overall. The biggest single difference is machine context, where Outpost24 Threat Compass scores 5 against 2. Of the nine criteria, Outpost24 Threat Compass is ahead on 4, ThreatMon on 1, and 4 are level.

Where they differ

Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.

Machine-Level Infection Context

Outpost24 Threat Compass +3
Outpost24 Threat Compass 5
ThreatMon 2

Infostealer Research & Attribution

Outpost24 Threat Compass +3
Outpost24 Threat Compass 8
ThreatMon 5

Pricing Accessibility & Time-to-Value

ThreatMon +2
Outpost24 Threat Compass 3
ThreatMon 5

Session Cookie & Token Coverage

Outpost24 Threat Compass +1
Outpost24 Threat Compass 2
ThreatMon 1

Collection Freshness

Outpost24 Threat Compass +1
Outpost24 Threat Compass 7
ThreatMon 6

Where they are level

Within half a point of each other.

Specialization · 4/10 Segmentation · 5/10 Free Access · 5/10 API · 5/10

Capabilities

4 of 8 capabilities differ.

CapabilityOutpost24 Threat CompassThreatMon
Machine-level infection data Partial No
Third-party / supply-chain exposure No Yes
Self-serve signup No Partial
Public infostealer research Yes Partial

Same on both: Session cookies & tokens (no), Employee vs. customer split (partial), API access (partial), Free tier / free API (partial).

Side by side

DetailOutpost24 Threat CompassThreatMon
Best suited to Outpost24 customers adding credential intelligence Teams wanting an all-in-one CTI and ASM tool
Pricing Modular pricing on request; free domain checker Pricing not published; free trial
Headquarters Sweden Istanbul, Turkey
Founded 2001 2022
Ownership Independent (acquired Blueliv, 2021) Independent
Website outpost24.com threatmon.io

Questions & answers

Which scores higher, Outpost24 Threat Compass or ThreatMon?

Outpost24 Threat Compass, with 48.9/100 against 41.0/100 (ranks #17 and #28).

Where do Outpost24 Threat Compass and ThreatMon differ most?

On machine-level infection context: Outpost24 Threat Compass scores 5 and ThreatMon scores 2.

Who is each one a good fit for?

Outpost24 Threat Compass suits outpost24 customers adding credential intelligence. ThreatMon suits teams wanting an all-in-one CTI and ASM tool.

More head-to-heads

Each vendor against its closest peers.

See your own infostealer exposure

Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.

Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.

This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.

Free Tools Check your exposure