The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
HHudson Rockor
TThreatMon?
Where Hudson Rock and ThreatMon differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
H Hudson Rock was started by former members of IDF Unit 8200 and works on one problem only: infostealer infections. Its Cavalier platform shows what each infected computer leaked, from credentials and cookies to the malware path and antivirus in place, and splits a company's exposure into employees, users, third parties and suppliers. It is also the research team behind InfoStealers.
T ThreatMon, from Istanbul, covers attack surface, fraud, dark web, CTI and supply-chain risk. Its botnet monitoring tracks stealer logs and scans for stolen employee and customer credentials.
HT
Quick take
Hudson Rock leads by a wide margin, 96.2 to 41.0 overall. The biggest single difference is machine context, where Hudson Rock scores 10 against 2. Of the nine criteria, Hudson Rock is ahead on 9, ThreatMon on 0, and 0 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
Machine-Level Infection Context
HHudson Rock +8
HHudson Rock 10
TThreatMon 2
Session Cookie & Token Coverage
HHudson Rock +8
HHudson Rock 9
TThreatMon 1
Infostealer Specialization
HHudson Rock +6
HHudson Rock 10
TThreatMon 4
Exposure Segmentation
HHudson Rock +5
HHudson Rock 10
TThreatMon 5
Infostealer Research & Attribution
HHudson Rock +5
HHudson Rock 10
TThreatMon 5
Free Tools & Free API
HHudson Rock +5
HHudson Rock 10
TThreatMon 5
API & Integrations
HHudson Rock +4
HHudson Rock 9
TThreatMon 5
Pricing Accessibility & Time-to-Value
HHudson Rock +4
HHudson Rock 9
TThreatMon 5
Collection Freshness
HHudson Rock +3
HHudson Rock 9
TThreatMon 6
Capabilities
6 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | HHudson Rock | TThreatMon |
|---|---|---|
| Machine-level infection data | Yes | No |
| Session cookies & tokens | Yes | No |
| Employee vs. customer split | Yes | Partial |
| API access | Yes | Partial |
| Free tier / free API | Yes | Partial |
| Public infostealer research | Yes | Partial |
Same on both: Third-party / supply-chain exposure (yes), Self-serve signup (partial).
Side by side
| Detail | HHudson Rock | TThreatMon |
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Security teams that need per-machine forensics and visibility into supplier exposure | Teams wanting an all-in-one CTI and ASM tool |
| Pricing | Free lookups and a free API key; Bayonet has a free signup with paid tiers; Cavalier is priced on request | Pricing not published; free trial |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Istanbul, Turkey |
| Founded | Not disclosed | 2022 |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Website | hudsonrock.com | threatmon.io |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Hudson Rock or ThreatMon?
Hudson Rock, with 96.2/100 against 41.0/100 (ranks #1 and #28).
Where do Hudson Rock and ThreatMon differ most?
On machine-level infection context: Hudson Rock scores 10 and ThreatMon scores 2.
Who is each one a good fit for?
Hudson Rock suits security teams that need per-machine forensics and visibility into supplier exposure. ThreatMon suits teams wanting an all-in-one CTI and ASM tool.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.