The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
HHudson Rockor
HHold Security?
Where Hudson Rock and Hold Security differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
Hudson Rock was started by former members of IDF Unit 8200 and works on one problem only: infostealer infections. Its Cavalier platform shows what each infected computer leaked, from credentials and cookies to the malware path and antivirus in place, and splits a company's exposure into employees, users, third parties and suppliers. It is also the research team behind InfoStealers.
Hold Security, led by Alex Holden in Milwaukee, is known for recovering large troves of botnet-stolen credentials. It runs a managed service that alerts companies when their own, their customers' or their suppliers' credentials turn up in non-public criminal sources.
Quick take
Hudson Rock leads by a wide margin, 96.2 to 36.4 overall. The biggest single difference is free access, where Hudson Rock scores 10 against 1. Of the nine criteria, Hudson Rock is ahead on 9, Hold Security on 0, and 0 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
Free Tools & Free API
Machine-Level Infection Context
Session Cookie & Token Coverage
API & Integrations
Pricing Accessibility & Time-to-Value
Exposure Segmentation
Infostealer Research & Attribution
Infostealer Specialization
Collection Freshness
Capabilities
8 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Machine-level infection data | Yes | No |
| Session cookies & tokens | Yes | No |
| Employee vs. customer split | Yes | Partial |
| Third-party / supply-chain exposure | Yes | Partial |
| API access | Yes | No |
| Free tier / free API | Yes | No |
| Self-serve signup | Partial | No |
| Public infostealer research | Yes | Partial |
Side by side
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Security teams that need per-machine forensics and visibility into supplier exposure | Organisations that prefer a managed credential-recovery service |
| Pricing | Free lookups and a free API key; Bayonet has a free signup with paid tiers; Cavalier is priced on request | Pricing not published |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Milwaukee, USA |
| Founded | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Website | hudsonrock.com | holdsecurity.com |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Hudson Rock or Hold Security?
Hudson Rock, with 96.2/100 against 36.4/100 (ranks #1 and #32).
Where do Hudson Rock and Hold Security differ most?
On free tools & free api: Hudson Rock scores 10 and Hold Security scores 1.
Who is each one a good fit for?
Hudson Rock suits security teams that need per-machine forensics and visibility into supplier exposure. Hold Security suits organisations that prefer a managed credential-recovery service.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.