The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
HHudson Rockor
WWhiteIntel?
Where Hudson Rock and WhiteIntel differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
H Hudson Rock was started by former members of IDF Unit 8200 and works on one problem only: infostealer infections. Its Cavalier platform shows what each infected computer leaked, from credentials and cookies to the malware path and antivirus in place, and splits a company's exposure into employees, users, third parties and suppliers. It is also the research team behind InfoStealers.
W WhiteIntel monitors the dark web, hacker forums, Telegram and stealer logs, and adds look-alike domain detection and GitHub secret scanning. Its domain search separates consumer leaks from corporate ones.
HW
Quick take
Hudson Rock leads by a wide margin, 96.2 to 61.1 overall. The biggest single difference is free access, where Hudson Rock scores 10 against 4. Of the nine criteria, Hudson Rock is ahead on 9, WhiteIntel on 0, and 0 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
Free Tools & Free API
HHudson Rock +6
HHudson Rock 10
WWhiteIntel 4
Machine-Level Infection Context
HHudson Rock +5
HHudson Rock 10
WWhiteIntel 5
Exposure Segmentation
HHudson Rock +5
HHudson Rock 10
WWhiteIntel 5
Infostealer Research & Attribution
HHudson Rock +5
HHudson Rock 10
WWhiteIntel 5
Session Cookie & Token Coverage
HHudson Rock +3
HHudson Rock 9
WWhiteIntel 6
Infostealer Specialization
HHudson Rock +2
HHudson Rock 10
WWhiteIntel 8
Collection Freshness
HHudson Rock +2
HHudson Rock 9
WWhiteIntel 7
Pricing Accessibility & Time-to-Value
HHudson Rock +2
HHudson Rock 9
WWhiteIntel 7
API & Integrations
HHudson Rock +1
HHudson Rock 9
WWhiteIntel 8
Capabilities
6 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | HHudson Rock | WWhiteIntel |
|---|---|---|
| Machine-level infection data | Yes | Partial |
| Session cookies & tokens | Yes | Partial |
| Employee vs. customer split | Yes | Partial |
| Third-party / supply-chain exposure | Yes | No |
| Free tier / free API | Yes | Partial |
| Public infostealer research | Yes | Partial |
Same on both: API access (yes), Self-serve signup (partial).
Side by side
| Detail | HHudson Rock | WWhiteIntel |
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Security teams that need per-machine forensics and visibility into supplier exposure | Smaller teams looking for affordable stealer monitoring |
| Pricing | Free lookups and a free API key; Bayonet has a free signup with paid tiers; Cavalier is priced on request | Pricing not published |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not disclosed |
| Founded | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Website | hudsonrock.com | whiteintel.io |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Hudson Rock or WhiteIntel?
Hudson Rock, with 96.2/100 against 61.1/100 (ranks #1 and #12).
Where do Hudson Rock and WhiteIntel differ most?
On free tools & free api: Hudson Rock scores 10 and WhiteIntel scores 4.
Who is each one a good fit for?
Hudson Rock suits security teams that need per-machine forensics and visibility into supplier exposure. WhiteIntel suits smaller teams looking for affordable stealer monitoring.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.