The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
HHudson Rockor
HHackedList?
Where Hudson Rock and HackedList differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
H Hudson Rock was started by former members of IDF Unit 8200 and works on one problem only: infostealer infections. Its Cavalier platform shows what each infected computer leaked, from credentials and cookies to the malware path and antivirus in place, and splits a company's exposure into employees, users, third parties and suppliers. It is also the research team behind InfoStealers.
H HackedList is an EU darknet monitoring service. Enter a domain to see credentials compromised by infostealers, then triage alerts or run deeper custom scans.
HH
Quick take
Hudson Rock leads by a wide margin, 96.2 to 38.2 overall. The biggest single difference is research, where Hudson Rock scores 10 against 1. Of the nine criteria, Hudson Rock is ahead on 9, HackedList on 0, and 0 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
Infostealer Research & Attribution
HHudson Rock +9
HHudson Rock 10
HHackedList 1
Machine-Level Infection Context
HHudson Rock +8
HHudson Rock 10
HHackedList 2
Exposure Segmentation
HHudson Rock +8
HHudson Rock 10
HHackedList 2
Session Cookie & Token Coverage
HHudson Rock +8
HHudson Rock 9
HHackedList 1
Free Tools & Free API
HHudson Rock +5
HHudson Rock 10
HHackedList 5
API & Integrations
HHudson Rock +5
HHudson Rock 9
HHackedList 4
Collection Freshness
HHudson Rock +4
HHudson Rock 9
HHackedList 5
Pricing Accessibility & Time-to-Value
HHudson Rock +3
HHudson Rock 9
HHackedList 6
Infostealer Specialization
HHudson Rock +2
HHudson Rock 10
HHackedList 8
Capabilities
7 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | HHudson Rock | HHackedList |
|---|---|---|
| Machine-level infection data | Yes | No |
| Session cookies & tokens | Yes | No |
| Employee vs. customer split | Yes | No |
| Third-party / supply-chain exposure | Yes | Partial |
| API access | Yes | Partial |
| Free tier / free API | Yes | Partial |
| Public infostealer research | Yes | No |
Same on both: Self-serve signup (partial).
Side by side
| Detail | HHudson Rock | HHackedList |
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Security teams that need per-machine forensics and visibility into supplier exposure | European SMBs wanting quick domain checks |
| Pricing | Free lookups and a free API key; Bayonet has a free signup with paid tiers; Cavalier is priced on request | Pricing not published |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Prague, Czech Republic |
| Founded | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Website | hudsonrock.com | hackedlist.io |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Hudson Rock or HackedList?
Hudson Rock, with 96.2/100 against 38.2/100 (ranks #1 and #30).
Where do Hudson Rock and HackedList differ most?
On infostealer research & attribution: Hudson Rock scores 10 and HackedList scores 1.
Who is each one a good fit for?
Hudson Rock suits security teams that need per-machine forensics and visibility into supplier exposure. HackedList suits european SMBs wanting quick domain checks.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.