The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
FFlashpointor
KKELA?
Where Flashpoint and KELA differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
F Flashpoint's Ignite platform covers cyber, fraud, vulnerability and physical-security intelligence from illicit forums, chat services and marketplaces. Its credential monitoring includes stealer logs with host and cookie context and a freshness indicator.
K KELA is an Israeli cybercrime intelligence company covering underground forums, markets and Telegram. Its Identity Guard module flags compromised employee and customer identities found in stealer logs, automated markets and ULP lists, checks credentials against login pages and can push responses to identity providers.
FK
Quick take
KELA leads by a clear margin, 66.6 to 62.1 overall. The biggest single difference is free access, where KELA scores 4 against 1. Of the nine criteria, Flashpoint is ahead on 2, KELA on 5, and 2 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
Free Tools & Free API
KKELA +3
FFlashpoint 1
KKELA 4
Machine-Level Infection Context
FFlashpoint +2
FFlashpoint 8
KKELA 6
Exposure Segmentation
KKELA +2
FFlashpoint 6
KKELA 8
API & Integrations
FFlashpoint +2
FFlashpoint 8
KKELA 6
Pricing Accessibility & Time-to-Value
KKELA +2
FFlashpoint 3
KKELA 5
Infostealer Specialization
KKELA +1
FFlashpoint 5
KKELA 6
Infostealer Research & Attribution
KKELA +1
FFlashpoint 8
KKELA 9
Where they are level
Within half a point of each other.
Capabilities
5 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | FFlashpoint | KKELA |
|---|---|---|
| Machine-level infection data | Yes | Partial |
| Employee vs. customer split | Partial | Yes |
| API access | Yes | Partial |
| Free tier / free API | No | Partial |
| Self-serve signup | No | Partial |
Same on both: Session cookies & tokens (yes), Third-party / supply-chain exposure (partial), Public infostealer research (yes).
Side by side
| Detail | FFlashpoint | KKELA |
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | CTI and fraud teams that need wide illicit-source coverage | Teams that want broad cybercrime intelligence plus identity alerts |
| Pricing | Enterprise pricing on request | Pricing on request; free trial available |
| Headquarters | New York, USA | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Founded | 2010 | 2009 |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Website | flashpoint.io | kelacyber.com |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Flashpoint or KELA?
KELA, with 66.6/100 against 62.1/100 (ranks #10 and #11).
Where do Flashpoint and KELA differ most?
On free tools & free api: Flashpoint scores 1 and KELA scores 4.
Who is each one a good fit for?
Flashpoint suits cTI and fraud teams that need wide illicit-source coverage. KELA suits teams that want broad cybercrime intelligence plus identity alerts.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.