The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
FFlashpointor
GGroup-IB?
Where Flashpoint and Group-IB differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
F Flashpoint's Ignite platform covers cyber, fraud, vulnerability and physical-security intelligence from illicit forums, chat services and marketplaces. Its credential monitoring includes stealer logs with host and cookie context and a freshness indicator.
G Group-IB provides threat intelligence, fraud protection and incident response and works closely with law enforcement. Its intelligence feed includes accounts and cards compromised through phishing, botnets and C2 servers, delivered by API and STIX/TAXII.
FG
Quick take
Flashpoint leads by a wide margin, 62.1 to 50.1 overall. The biggest single difference is machine context, where Flashpoint scores 8 against 5. Of the nine criteria, Flashpoint is ahead on 6, Group-IB on 0, and 3 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
Machine-Level Infection Context
FFlashpoint +3
FFlashpoint 8
GGroup-IB 5
Session Cookie & Token Coverage
FFlashpoint +3
FFlashpoint 8
GGroup-IB 5
Infostealer Specialization
FFlashpoint +1
FFlashpoint 5
GGroup-IB 4
Exposure Segmentation
FFlashpoint +1
FFlashpoint 6
GGroup-IB 5
Collection Freshness
FFlashpoint +1
FFlashpoint 8
GGroup-IB 7
Pricing Accessibility & Time-to-Value
FFlashpoint +1
FFlashpoint 3
GGroup-IB 2
Where they are level
Within half a point of each other.
Capabilities
3 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | FFlashpoint | GGroup-IB |
|---|---|---|
| Machine-level infection data | Yes | Partial |
| Session cookies & tokens | Yes | Partial |
| Third-party / supply-chain exposure | Partial | No |
Same on both: Employee vs. customer split (partial), API access (yes), Free tier / free API (no), Self-serve signup (no), Public infostealer research (yes).
Side by side
| Detail | FFlashpoint | GGroup-IB |
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | CTI and fraud teams that need wide illicit-source coverage | Enterprises and banks wanting broad intelligence with compromised data |
| Pricing | Enterprise pricing on request | Modular pricing on request |
| Headquarters | New York, USA | Singapore |
| Founded | 2010 | 2003 |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Website | flashpoint.io | group-ib.com |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Flashpoint or Group-IB?
Flashpoint, with 62.1/100 against 50.1/100 (ranks #11 and #15).
Where do Flashpoint and Group-IB differ most?
On machine-level infection context: Flashpoint scores 8 and Group-IB scores 5.
Who is each one a good fit for?
Flashpoint suits cTI and fraud teams that need wide illicit-source coverage. Group-IB suits enterprises and banks wanting broad intelligence with compromised data.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.