The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
CConstella Intelligenceor
SSOCRadar?
Where Constella Intelligence and SOCRadar differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
C Constella Intelligence came out of the 2020 merger of 4iQ and Alto Analytics. It sells identity risk data for account-takeover and fraud prevention through APIs, feeds and its Hunter tool, including an infostealer API with session cookies, hostnames, IPs and malware strain.
S SOCRadar combines attack surface management, digital risk protection and threat intelligence, and offers a free edition for small companies. Its identity module turns stealer data into per-endpoint views mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, including exposed apps and cookies.
CS
Quick take
SOCRadar leads by a narrow margin, 70.4 to 68.9 overall. The biggest single difference is free access, where SOCRadar scores 8 against 2. Of the nine criteria, Constella Intelligence is ahead on 4, SOCRadar on 4, and 1 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
Free Tools & Free API
SSOCRadar +6
CConstella Intelligence 2
SSOCRadar 8
API & Integrations
CConstella Intelligence +3
CConstella Intelligence 9
SSOCRadar 6
Pricing Accessibility & Time-to-Value
SSOCRadar +3
CConstella Intelligence 4
SSOCRadar 7
Infostealer Specialization
CConstella Intelligence +2
CConstella Intelligence 7
SSOCRadar 5
Exposure Segmentation
CConstella Intelligence +2
CConstella Intelligence 6
SSOCRadar 4
Machine-Level Infection Context
SSOCRadar +1
CConstella Intelligence 8
SSOCRadar 9
Session Cookie & Token Coverage
CConstella Intelligence +1
CConstella Intelligence 9
SSOCRadar 8
Infostealer Research & Attribution
SSOCRadar +1
CConstella Intelligence 8
SSOCRadar 9
Where they are level
Within half a point of each other.
Capabilities
4 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | CConstella Intelligence | SSOCRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Employee vs. customer split | Partial | No |
| API access | Yes | Partial |
| Free tier / free API | No | Yes |
| Self-serve signup | No | Partial |
Same on both: Machine-level infection data (yes), Session cookies & tokens (yes), Third-party / supply-chain exposure (partial), Public infostealer research (yes).
Side by side
| Detail | CConstella Intelligence | SSOCRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Fraud and account-takeover teams consuming data by API | Teams that want stealer forensics inside a broad CTI suite |
| Pricing | Enterprise pricing on request | Free edition; paid tiers on request |
| Headquarters | Los Altos, USA | Delaware, USA |
| Founded | 2020 | 2018 |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Website | constella.ai | socradar.io |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Constella Intelligence or SOCRadar?
SOCRadar, with 70.4/100 against 68.9/100 (ranks #6 and #7).
Where do Constella Intelligence and SOCRadar differ most?
On free tools & free api: Constella Intelligence scores 2 and SOCRadar scores 8.
Who is each one a good fit for?
Constella Intelligence suits fraud and account-takeover teams consuming data by API. SOCRadar suits teams that want stealer forensics inside a broad CTI suite.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.