Skip to content

The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head

Check Point (Cyberint)orCybelAngel?

Where Check Point (Cyberint) and CybelAngel differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.

Updated October 12, 2026 How scoring works
Check Point (Cyberint)
Broad CTI platform
53.1
Rank #13 of 34
Ahead overall

Cyberint, maker of the Argos external risk platform, was acquired by Check Point in 2024 and is now part of Check Point Exposure Management. Its dark web monitoring sends verified alerts on leaked employee credentials and infections, combining automation with human intelligence.

CybelAngel
Broad CTI platform
48.1
Rank #18 of 34

CybelAngel, founded in Paris in 2013, monitors data leaked outside the perimeter with analyst-reviewed alerts. It added infostealer credential detection in 2023, reporting IPs, extraction dates and target URLs.

Quick take

Check Point (Cyberint) leads by a clear margin, 53.1 to 48.1 overall. The biggest single difference is free access, where Check Point (Cyberint) scores 4 against 1. Of the nine criteria, Check Point (Cyberint) is ahead on 3, CybelAngel on 1, and 5 are level.

Where they differ

Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.

Free Tools & Free API

Check Point (Cyberint) +3
Check Point (Cyberint) 4
CybelAngel 1

API & Integrations

Check Point (Cyberint) +3
Check Point (Cyberint) 8
CybelAngel 5

Session Cookie & Token Coverage

CybelAngel +2
Check Point (Cyberint) 3
CybelAngel 5

Infostealer Research & Attribution

Check Point (Cyberint) +1
Check Point (Cyberint) 8
CybelAngel 7

Where they are level

Within half a point of each other.

Specialization · 4/10 Machine Context · 5/10 Segmentation · 6/10 Freshness · 7/10 Accessibility · 3/10

Capabilities

4 of 8 capabilities differ.

CapabilityCheck Point (Cyberint)CybelAngel
Session cookies & tokens No Partial
Third-party / supply-chain exposure Partial No
API access Yes Partial
Free tier / free API Partial No

Same on both: Machine-level infection data (partial), Employee vs. customer split (partial), Self-serve signup (no), Public infostealer research (yes).

Side by side

DetailCheck Point (Cyberint)CybelAngel
Best suited to Check Point customers who want dark web alerts linked to remediation Teams that prefer curated, analyst-checked alerts
Pricing Pricing on request Pricing on request
Headquarters Tel Aviv, Israel Paris, France
Founded Not disclosed 2013
Ownership Acquired by Check Point (2024) Independent
Website checkpoint.com cybelangel.com

Questions & answers

Which scores higher, Check Point (Cyberint) or CybelAngel?

Check Point (Cyberint), with 53.1/100 against 48.1/100 (ranks #13 and #18).

Where do Check Point (Cyberint) and CybelAngel differ most?

On free tools & free api: Check Point (Cyberint) scores 4 and CybelAngel scores 1.

Who is each one a good fit for?

Check Point (Cyberint) suits check Point customers who want dark web alerts linked to remediation. CybelAngel suits teams that prefer curated, analyst-checked alerts.

More head-to-heads

Each vendor against its closest peers.

See your own infostealer exposure

Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.

Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.

This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.

Free Tools Check your exposure