The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
HHudson Rockor
KKaduu?
Where Hudson Rock and Kaduu differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
H Hudson Rock was started by former members of IDF Unit 8200 and works on one problem only: infostealer infections. Its Cavalier platform shows what each infected computer leaked, from credentials and cookies to the malware path and antivirus in place, and splits a company's exposure into employees, users, third parties and suppliers. It is also the research team behind InfoStealers.
K Kaduu is a Swiss company whose DarknetSearch service watches the dark and deep web for exposed company data, mainly for MSSPs and SOCs. Botnet logs are one of several sources; there is no dedicated infostealer module.
HK
Quick take
Hudson Rock leads by a wide margin, 96.2 to 33.3 overall. The biggest single difference is machine context, where Hudson Rock scores 10 against 2. Of the nine criteria, Hudson Rock is ahead on 9, Kaduu on 0, and 0 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
Machine-Level Infection Context
HHudson Rock +8
HHudson Rock 10
KKaduu 2
Exposure Segmentation
HHudson Rock +8
HHudson Rock 10
KKaduu 2
Session Cookie & Token Coverage
HHudson Rock +8
HHudson Rock 9
KKaduu 1
Infostealer Research & Attribution
HHudson Rock +8
HHudson Rock 10
KKaduu 2
Infostealer Specialization
HHudson Rock +7
HHudson Rock 10
KKaduu 3
Free Tools & Free API
HHudson Rock +6
HHudson Rock 10
KKaduu 4
Collection Freshness
HHudson Rock +4
HHudson Rock 9
KKaduu 5
API & Integrations
HHudson Rock +4
HHudson Rock 9
KKaduu 5
Pricing Accessibility & Time-to-Value
HHudson Rock +1
HHudson Rock 9
KKaduu 8
Capabilities
7 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | HHudson Rock | KKaduu |
|---|---|---|
| Machine-level infection data | Yes | No |
| Session cookies & tokens | Yes | No |
| Employee vs. customer split | Yes | No |
| Third-party / supply-chain exposure | Yes | No |
| API access | Yes | Partial |
| Free tier / free API | Yes | Partial |
| Public infostealer research | Yes | No |
Same on both: Self-serve signup (partial).
Side by side
| Detail | HHudson Rock | KKaduu |
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Security teams that need per-machine forensics and visibility into supplier exposure | MSSPs wanting affordable dark web monitoring |
| Pricing | Free lookups and a free API key; Bayonet has a free signup with paid tiers; Cavalier is priced on request | Low flat-rate entry pricing reported; free trial |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Zug, Switzerland |
| Founded | Not disclosed | 2018 |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Website | hudsonrock.com | kaduu.io |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, Hudson Rock or Kaduu?
Hudson Rock, with 96.2/100 against 33.3/100 (ranks #1 and #34).
Where do Hudson Rock and Kaduu differ most?
On machine-level infection context: Hudson Rock scores 10 and Kaduu scores 2.
Who is each one a good fit for?
Hudson Rock suits security teams that need per-machine forensics and visibility into supplier exposure. Kaduu suits mSSPs wanting affordable dark web monitoring.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.