The Infostealer Index · Head-to-head
DDarkOwlor
GGroup-IB?
Where DarkOwl and Group-IB differ on infostealer intelligence, biggest gap first.
D DarkOwl sells darknet data through its Vision search platform and APIs, and other vendors often build on it. Stealer-log content is tagged and grouped by infected machine.
G Group-IB provides threat intelligence, fraud protection and incident response and works closely with law enforcement. Its intelligence feed includes accounts and cards compromised through phishing, botnets and C2 servers, delivered by API and STIX/TAXII.
DG
Quick take
Group-IB leads by a clear margin, 50.1 to 43.6 overall. The biggest single difference is segmentation, where Group-IB scores 5 against 2. Of the nine criteria, DarkOwl is ahead on 2, Group-IB on 4, and 3 are level.
Where they differ
Criteria with more than half a point between them, largest gap first.
Exposure Segmentation
GGroup-IB +3
DDarkOwl 2
GGroup-IB 5
Session Cookie & Token Coverage
GGroup-IB +3
DDarkOwl 2
GGroup-IB 5
Pricing Accessibility & Time-to-Value
DDarkOwl +2
DDarkOwl 4
GGroup-IB 2
Infostealer Specialization
GGroup-IB +1
DDarkOwl 3
GGroup-IB 4
Infostealer Research & Attribution
GGroup-IB +1
DDarkOwl 7
GGroup-IB 8
API & Integrations
DDarkOwl +1
DDarkOwl 9
GGroup-IB 8
Where they are level
Within half a point of each other.
Capabilities
3 of 8 capabilities differ.
| Capability | DDarkOwl | GGroup-IB |
|---|---|---|
| Session cookies & tokens | No | Partial |
| Employee vs. customer split | No | Partial |
| Third-party / supply-chain exposure | Partial | No |
Same on both: Machine-level infection data (partial), API access (yes), Free tier / free API (no), Self-serve signup (no), Public infostealer research (yes).
Side by side
| Detail | DDarkOwl | GGroup-IB |
|---|---|---|
| Best suited to | Analysts and vendors who want raw darknet data by API | Enterprises and banks wanting broad intelligence with compromised data |
| Pricing | Subscription or data licensing, priced on request | Modular pricing on request |
| Headquarters | Denver, USA | Singapore |
| Founded | Not disclosed | 2003 |
| Ownership | Independent | Independent |
| Website | darkowl.com | group-ib.com |
Questions & answers
Which scores higher, DarkOwl or Group-IB?
Group-IB, with 50.1/100 against 43.6/100 (ranks #15 and #26).
Where do DarkOwl and Group-IB differ most?
On exposure segmentation: DarkOwl scores 2 and Group-IB scores 5.
Who is each one a good fit for?
DarkOwl suits analysts and vendors who want raw darknet data by API. Group-IB suits enterprises and banks wanting broad intelligence with compromised data.
More head-to-heads
Each vendor against its closest peers.
See your own infostealer exposure
Rankings only go so far. Look up your domain for free and see which employees, customers and suppliers have already been hit by infostealers.
Scores are Hudson Rock's editorial opinion of each vendor's infostealer intelligence, based on public information (websites, documentation and published research) as of October 12, 2026. Only infostealer-related capabilities are assessed, not a vendor's overall quality or other products. Field averages, peer matches and comparisons are calculated from those scores.
This is general information, not a recommendation to buy or avoid any product, and it may be out of date: confirm details with each vendor. Product names and logos belong to their owners and are used only to identify them. Vendors can request a correction through Hudson Rock's contact page.